- 1Circular No. 02/2013/TT-NHNN of January 21, 2013, on classification of assets, levels and method of setting up of risk provisions, and use of provisions against credit risks in the banking activity of credit institutions, foreign banks’ branches
- 2Decree No. 55/2015/ND-CP dated June 9, 2015, the credit policy for agricultural and rural development
- 3Circular No. 30/2015/TT-NHNN dated December 25, 2015, regulations on issuance of licenses, organization and operation of non-bank credit institutions
- 4Law No. 91/2015/QH13 dated November 24, 2015, The Civil Code
- 5Circular No. 19/2016/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2016, on bank card operations
- 6Circular No. 22/2016/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2016, on the purchase of corporate bonds by credit institutions and branches of foreign banks
- 7Circular No. 39/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016,
- 8Circular No. 02/2017/TT-NHNN dated May 17, 2017, on factoring services provided by credit institutions and branches of foreign banks
- 9Decree No. 93/2017/ND-CP dated August 07, 2017 on the financial regime applicable to credit institutions, branches of foreign banks and financial supervision, assessment of effectiveness of state capital investment in wholly state-owned credit institutions and partially state-owned credit institutions
- 10Circular No. 16/2018/TT-BTC dated February 7, 2018 on guidelines for financial regulations applied to credit institutions and branches of foreign banks
- 11Official Dispatch No. 1576/NHNN-CSTT dated March 14, 2017 response to questions concerning regulations in the Circular No. 39/2016/TT-NHNN
- 12Decree No. 163/2018/ND-CP dated December 4, 2018 on issuance of corporate bonds
THE STATE BANK OF VIETNAM | THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM |
No.: 3339/NHNN-TTGSNH | Hanoi, May 08, 2020 |
To: | - Credit institutions; |
On March 13, 2020, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) has promulgated the Circular No. 01/2020/TT-NHNN prescribing debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interest and fees, retention of debt category to assist borrowers affected by Covid-19 pandemic (Circular 01). Circular 01 comes into force from March 13, 2020.
In order to ensure consistent implementation of Circular 01 by all credit institutions and foreign bank branches, SBV provides specific guidelines for implementation of Circular 01 which are published on SBV’s website./.
| BY ORDER OF GOVERNOR |
FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CIRCULAR NO. 01/2020/TT-NHNN DATED MARCH 13, 2020 PRESCRIBING DEBT RESCHEDULING, EXEMPTION OR REDUCTION OF INTEREST AND FEES, RETENTION OF DEBT CATEGORY TO ASSIST BORROWERS AFFECTED BY COVID-19 PANDEMIC (CIRCULAR 01)
(Enclosed with the Official Dispatch No. 3339/NHNN-TTGSNH dated May 08, 2020 of the State Bank of Vietnam)
1. Debts to be rescheduled according to Circular 01
Question 1
SBV is requested to expand the scope of application, including investments in corporate bonds, credit extension by issuance of credit cards, discounting and factoring, etc.
Answer
- Presently, definition and principles of debt rescheduling are provided for in the Circular No. 39/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016 of the State Bank of Vietnam prescribing lending transactions of credit institutions and foreign bank branches with customers (Circular 39) and the Circular No. 30/2015/TT-NHNN dated December 25, 2015 on licensing, organization and operation of non-banking credit institutions (as amended) (Circular 30). Legislative documents prescribing forms of credit extension include Circular 04 (prescribing discounting), Circular 07 (prescribing bank guarantee), Circular No. 02/2017/TT-NHNN (prescribing factoring), the Government’s Decree No. 163/2018/ND-CP dated December 04, 2018 prescribing issuance of corporate bonds, Circular No. 22/2016/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2016 of State Bank of Vietnam prescribing purchase of corporate bonds by credit institutions and foreign bank branches (as amended) but provide no provisions on debt rescheduling.
With regard to discounting and factoring, terms of discounting and factoring depend on not only borrowers’ solvency but also remaining terms of financial instruments, receivables and payables specified in goods sale and service provision contracts, and recourse periods.
With regard to bank guarantee, if the credit institution must not fulfill financial obligations on behalf of its customer, there are no grounds for debt rescheduling because the time the customer repays debt to the credit institution or foreign bank branch is not determined; if the credit institution has fulfilled financial obligations on behalf of its customer, pursuant to Circular 02, the credit institution shall classify that debt into group 3 (bad debts). Hence, if the guaranteed debt is rescheduled and has its category kept unchanged, it is still classified into group 3 (bad debts), and debt rescheduling and retention of debt category are not helpful to customers.
With regard to purchase and investment in corporate bonds, the change of the term for paying bond principal and/or interest is not subject to decision of the credit institution or foreign bank branch but the decision of the bond issuer (the credit institution or foreign bank branch only owns that bond). The change of term for paying bond principal and/or interest depends on terms and conditions of each type of bonds and requires the approval given by bond owners (in addition to credit institutions, bond owners also include securities companies, investment funds, insurance companies, other foreign institutional and individual investors) according to the procedures laid down in the Government's Decree No. 163/2018/ND-CP on issuance of corporate bonds and relevant legislative documents. Thus, grant of permission to credit institutions and foreign bank branches to reschedule debts relating to corporate bonds is not reasonable.
- Based on statistical data given by SBV, as of April 14, 2020, total outstanding balances of loans, investments in corporate bonds and other credit extension forms account for 96.94%, 2.47% and 0.59% respectively. Thus, the fact Circular 01 only provides regulations on debt rescheduling, retention of debt category with respect to debts incurred from loans and finance lease transactions is reasonable and meets demands of borrowers of credit institutions and foreign bank branches who are affected by Covid-19.
Circular 01 stipulates that debt rescheduling and retention of debt category apply to debts incurred from loans and financial lease but debts incurred from discounting, factoring, bank guarantee, purchase and investment in corporate bonds. This is considered reasonable.
Question 2
Whether or not overdrafts are treated according to the provisions of Circular 01?
Answer
Pursuant to the provisions in the Circular No. 39/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016, Circular No. 19/2016/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2016, of the State Bank of Vietnam on bank cards, overdraft facility granted on debit cards and checking accounts is considered a form of lending, thus credit institutions and foreign bank branches are allowed to carry out debt rescheduling, exemption and reduction of interests and fees, and retention of debt category with respect to outstanding debts of the said lending form when meeting the relevant requirements set out in Circular 01.
Question 3
Whether or not credit institutions and foreign bank branches are allowed to carry out debt rescheduling and retention of debt category according to Circular 01 with respect to debts arising after January 23, 2020?
Answer
Clause 1 Article 6 of Circular No. 01 stipulates: “Credit institutions and foreign bank branches may retain the categories of the following debts if they have been categorized in accordance with regulations of the State bank of Vietnam before January 23, 2020:…”
Pursuant to this regulation, debts to be rescheduled and whose category is kept unchanged according to Circular 01 do not include debts incurred after January 23, 2020.
With respect to loans and financial leases arising after January 23, 2020 (after Covid-19 Pandemic has been announced by the Government), credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall determine terms of loans and financial leases based on the Covid-19 situation and characteristics of borrowers. Rescheduling and retention of categories of these debts as prescribed in Circular 01 are not reasonable.
2. Times of debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interests, and retention of debt category
Question 4
Whether or not times of debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interests, and retention of debt category are limited under Circular 01?
Answer
Times of debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interests and retention of debt category are not limited under Circular 01. When rescheduling, exempting or reducing interests, and retaining category of debts, credit institutions and foreign bank branches must strictly comply with the provisions in Circular 01.
Question 5
SBV is requested to consider allowing credit institutions to decide provisions for credit losses or reduce provision ratios.
Answer
Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 17 of the Government’s Decree No. 93/2017/ND-CP dated August 07, 2017 introducing financial mechanism of credit institutions and foreign bank branches, costs shall be determined and recorded in accordance with Vietnam’s accounting standards and relevant laws.
Thus, provisions must be set aside in conformity with the risk levels of credited assets (based on debt classification results) and in a manner ensuring that the credit institution, or foreign bank branch, may take its financial initiative in dealing with risks, and the creation of provisions must be performed consistently throughout the network of the credit institution in accordance with SBV’s regulations after obtaining an approval from the Ministry of Finance.
Question 6
Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 7 of Circular 01, credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall establish and specify criteria for determining outstanding debts of borrowers affected by Covid-19 in their internal regulations. During the application of this provision, a customer may be treated by credit institutions in different manners. E.g. A customer’s debt may be rescheduled and kept at the current debt group at credit institution A but credit institution B. Hence, whether or not this customer is subject to the mechanism for re-classification of debts according to CIC’s List of borrower?
Answer
Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 6 of Circular 01, if the extended repayment period of a debt which has been rescheduled or has interest exempted or reduced or has its category retained according to Circular 01 is not yet expired and the borrower is assessed by the credit institution or foreign bank branch to be capable of fully repaying debt by the rescheduled deadline, the credit institution or foreign bank branch must not re-classify this debt into a group of debts with a higher risk level (i.e. the credit institution or foreign bank branch must neither re-classify the debt according to CIC’s list of borrowers nor re-classify the debt into a group of debts with a higher risk level according to the outstanding debts and other off-balance sheet commitments of customers that are not regulated entities of Circular 01).
Question 7
Pursuant to Clause 2 Article 6 of Circular 01, whether the provision for the debt which is rescheduled, has its interest exempted or reduced, or is retained in the current debt group, shall be set aside according to the debt group prescribed in Circular 01 or the debt group prescribed in Article 10 of Circular No. 02/2013/TT-NHNN?
Answer
Credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall consider the debt groups prescribed in Circular 01 for determining and setting aside the corresponding provisions in accordance with law regulations on debt classification, creation and use of provisions for credit losses incurred during operations of credit institutions and foreign bank branches.
4. Recording of interests receivable as prescribed in Clause 3 Article 6 of Circular 01
Question 8
SBV is requested to allow credit institutions to record the interests on the debts which have been rescheduled and kept in group 1 as revenue.
Answer
Clause 3 Article 6 of Circular No. 01 stipulates: “From the rescheduling date, credit institutions and foreign bank branches are not required to record the interests on the outstanding debts that are rescheduled, debts on which interest is reduced or exempted, and debts that remain current non-performing loans (Group 1) as prescribed in this Circular as revenue. Instead, they shall be monitored off-balance sheet and recorded as revenue when they are collected in accordance with regulations of law on financial mechanism applied to credit institutions and foreign bank branches.”
This provision on recording of estimated interests on the debts which have been rescheduled and retained in group 1 inherits from the provisions on recording of interest receivables on the debts that remain current non-performing loans according to the State policies provided in the Circular No. 16/2018/TT-BTC dated February 07, 2018 of the Ministry of Finance providing guidelines for financial regulations applied to credit institutions and foreign bank branches, is conformable with the Government’s Decree No. 93/2017/ND-CP introducing financial mechanism for credit institutions and foreign bank branches, and accounting standards for recording of revenues from interests, and also reflects the financial status, public and transparent operations of credit institutions and foreign bank branches. According to this provision, credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall not record the interests on the debts which have been rescheduled and remained current non-performing loans as prescribed in Circular 01 as revenue if they are not actually collected; when they are collected, they shall be recorded as revenue according to the applicable financial mechanism.
Question 9
Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 6 of Circular 01, credit institutions believe that the entire interests on the debts which are rescheduled and the debts on which the interest is exempted or reduced must be monitored off-balance sheet; pursuant to Clause 3 Article 6 of Circular 01, cases of interest exemption must be also monitored off-balance sheet. Thus, SBV is requested to provide specific guidelines on this content.
Answer
Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 6 of Circular 01, from the rescheduling date, credit institutions and foreign bank branches are not required to record the estimated interests on the outstanding debts that are retained in Group 1 as prescribed in Circular 01 as revenue. Instead, they shall be monitored off-balance sheet and recorded as revenue when they are collected in accordance with regulations of law on financial mechanism applied to credit institutions and foreign bank branches.
The interests incurred before the rescheduling date on the debts which are retained in group 1 as prescribed in Circular 01 and the interests on the debts which are classified according to other regulations on debt classification, creation and use of provisions for credit losses during operations of credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall be recorded by credit institutions and foreign bank branches in accordance with the Circular No. 16/2018/TT-BTC dated February 07, 2018 of the Ministry of Finance and its amending and superseding documents (if any).
The interests on the debts on which the interest is entirely exempted and the debts which are retained in group 1 shall be monitored off-balance sheet in accordance with Clause 3 Article 6 of Circular 01.
Question 10
SBV is requested to consider promulgating simplified procedures for debt rescheduling.
Answer
Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 4 of Circular 01, credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall decide the rescheduling of debts in consideration of the borrowers’ request and ability to fully repay the principal and/or interest after the debt is rescheduled. The debt rescheduling decision must be suitable for the impacts of Covid-19 and used as the basis for determining the new repayment deadlines for borrowers who have debts rescheduled. Credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall specify procedures for debt rescheduling in their internal regulations which must meet the relevant rules and requirements set out in Circular 01.
Credit institutions and foreign bank branches are requested to promulgate their internal procedures/regulations on debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interest and fees in accordance with Circular 01, and organize the consistent implementation of such procedures/regulations throughout their systems; review and simplify their procedures/regulations in order to reduce periods of processing of borrowers’ applications for debt rescheduling. Information on cases where borrowers are not eligible for the assistance program must be provided in a timely, adequate and transparent manner so as to reduce complaints from borrowers.
Question 11
SBV is requested to provide guidelines on retention of debt category in the following cases: The debts are classified in group 1 before January 23, 2020. The debts are classified in group 2 on March 20, 2020 due to overdue interests. The borrowers incur no overdue debts because the entire interests incurred from January 23, 2020 to the end of May, 2020 are exempted; In such cases, the re-classification of debts into group 1 is made automatically or requires an approval for retention of debt category.
Answer
Pursuant to Article 6 of Circular 01, credit institutions and foreign bank branches may retain the categories of the debts which have been classified in accordance with SBV’s regulations before January 23, 2020 if the outstanding debts on which the interest is exempted or reduced meet all of relevant requirements set out in Circular 01. Procedures for exemption or reduction of interests and retention of debt category are included in the internal regulations adopted by credit institutions and foreign bank branches and should be conformable with the provision in Point b Clause 2 Article 7 of Circular 01.
6. Determination of groups of debts to be retained
Question 12
The provision that the debt categories determined before January 23, 2020 shall be retained is not reasonable because a debt which is classified in group 2 before January 23, 2020 may be eligible to be classified in group 1 at the time of debt rescheduling.
Answer
Clause 1 Article 6 of Circular 01 stipulates that credit institutions and foreign bank branches may retain the categories of the debts which have been classified in accordance with SBV’s regulations before January 23, 2020.
The debt mentioned by the credit institution is incurred by the borrower whose solvency is being put under consideration for re-classification of his/her/its debt into a group of debts with lower risk level, However, during this consideration period, the borrower’s revenue or income is reduced due to negative impacts of Covid-19. Thus, determination of debt category before January 23, 2020 as prescribed in Circular 01 is reasonable and may reflect the borrower’s solvency.
Question 13
Whether or not credit institutions and foreign bank branches may re-classify the debts which have been rescheduled and retained in group 2 or 3 as prescribed in Circular 01 into the group of debts with lower risk level when the borrowers are capable of repaying debts?
Answer
Article 3 of Circular 01 stipulates: “Debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interest and fees, retention of debt category to assist borrowers affected by Covid-19 pandemic shall comply with the regulations of this Circular; other contents on debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interest and fees, and debt classification that are not provided for in this Circular shall comply with relevant legislative documents.”.
Pursuant to this provision, the re-classification of the debts which have been rescheduled and retained in current debt groups as prescribed in Circular 01 into the group of debts with lower risk level shall comply with relevant law regulations on debt classification, creation and use of provisions for credit losses incurred during operations of credit institutions and foreign bank branches.
Question 14
SBV is requested to provide guidelines on principles for classification of the debts which are retained in current debt groups as prescribed in Circular 01 but borrowers are unable to repay debts by rescheduled deadlines (whether they are classified as the rescheduled debts that are overdue or as normal overdue debts?)
Answer
Pursuant to Article 3 of Circular 01, credit institutions and foreign bank branches shall take the debt rescheduling method (installation revision or extension of repayment period), times of debt rescheduling (including the debt rescheduling made according to Circular 01), and total days past due into consideration and classify the outstanding debts, which have been rescheduled and retained in their current debt groups as prescribed in Circular 01 but borrowers are unable to repay the debts by the rescheduled deadlines, into the corresponding debt groups in accordance with law regulations on debt classification, creation and use of provisions for credit losses incurred during operations of credit institutions and foreign bank branches.
Question 15
Circular 01 stipulates the rescheduling of the debts of which the principal and/or interest arises during the period from January 23, 2020 to the day following the end of 03 months after the Prime Minister officially declares an end of Covid-19 pandemic. However, due to the unforeseen development of Covid-19 pandemic, credit institutions cannot determine when Covid-19 pandemic ends to determine the debts to be rescheduled. Whether the case in which the repayment period under the indebtedness contract covering the debt rescheduled and having debt group retained according to Circular 01 exceeds the period T+3 after the Covid-19 pandemic ends is considered to violate relevant regulations or not?
Answer
The period from January 23, 2020 to the day following the end of 03 months after the Prime Minister officially declares an end of Covid-19 pandemic prescribed in Point b Clause 1 Article 4 of Circular 01 is used for determining the scope of debts to be rescheduled and those with retained debt groups. The repayment of debt may be extended for a period not exceeding 12 months from the initial repayment deadline according to the signed agreement/contract. The provision in Circular 01 does not mean that the debt which has been rescheduled must be repaid by the day following the end of 03 months after the Prime Minister officially declares an end of Covid-19 pandemic.
Question 16
SBV is requested to provide guidelines on the following contents:
- Pursuant to Point a Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01, whether or not a credit institution is required to reschedule the debt which is undue or less than 10 days past due within 10 days past due?
- Pursuant to Point b Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01, whether or not a credit institution is required to reschedule debts within the period from the effective date of the Circular to the 16th day from the effective date of the Circular?
Answer:
- Pursuant to Point a Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01, credit institutions shall reschedule and retain the category of the debt which is undue or less than 10 days past due.
- The provision in Point b Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01 is used for determining the scope of debts to be rescheduled according to Circular 01 (including the debt becomes overdue during the period from January 23, 2020 to the 16th day from the effective date of Circular 01); Time limits and procedures for rescheduling of the debt defined in Point b Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01 are decided by credit institutions and foreign bank branches and specified in their internal regulations. They should meet relevant principles and requirements laid down in Circular 01 and may assist borrowers in a timely manner.
Question 17
SBV is requested to allow the application of Circular 01 to borrowers instead of their outstanding debts as prescribed in Circular 01.
Answer:
Based on reports and recommendations of credit institutions on assistance given to borrowers affected by Covid-19 Pandemic, SBV’s Circular 01 applies to the outstanding debts of borrowers affected by Covid-19 Pandemic but borrowers directly for the following reasons: Circular 01 aims to assist borrowers affected by Covid-19 Pandemic and thus assist them in accessing new credit lines. However, risks (including moral hazard and credit losses) must be minimized during the implementation of Circular 01. Hence, Circular 01 only applies to the outstanding debts which cannot be paid on schedule by the borrowers who are affected by Covid-19 Pandemic and does not apply to borrowers directly.
Question 18
Whether or not the provisions in Circular 01 apply to all of short-term, medium-term and long-term debts?
Answer
Circular 01 does not stipulate the lending forms. Credit institutions shall reschedule, exempt or reduce interests on, and retain the category of any outstanding debts that meet the requirements set out in Circular 01 regardless of whether they are short-term, medium-term or long-term debts.
Question 19
Pursuant to Circular 01, the debt is extended for a maximum period of 12 month. This is not appropriate to long-term loans which are granted for the purpose of investing in resorts. Thus, SBV is requested to allow credit institutions to decide debt rescheduling periods.
Answer
The provision in Point b Clause 3 Article 4 of Circular 01 aims to facilitate credit institutions and foreign bank branches in debt rescheduling and is appropriate to all lending forms. During the period T+12 months prescribed in Point b Clause 3 Article 4 of Circular 01, T is the final date on which the borrower is required to fully repay the principal and/or interest to the credit institution under the signed credit agreement/contract. It is not the due date of each repayment period indicated in the credit agreement/contract.
Question 20
With regard to a loan disbursed according to the credit line, if the credit institution has rescheduled and retained the category of the debt according to Circular 01, whether or not a new disbursement is granted at the request of the borrower because it is still within the approved credit line? And whether or not the new disbursement must be reported to SBV and the recording of estimated revenue relating to such disbursement must be suspended as the debt which has been rescheduled and has its category retained as prescribed in Circular 01?
Answer
- Credit institution or foreign bank branch shall decide the grant of new disbursement within the approved credit line to the borrower, which must be conformable with relevant laws and its internal regulations.
- Credit institution shall submit reports according to statistical regulations adopted by SBV.
- Based on the provisions in Circular 01 and answers to Question 3 and Question 8 herein, the credit institution shall determine the debt group and record estimated interests on debts arising from new disbursements within the credit line.
Question 21
SBV is requested to provide guidelines on determination of revenue and income decreased due to impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic in the following 02 cases:
- The credit institution grants a loan to the borrower for executing a project but the project is not put into operation due to the impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic, and thus the borrower earns no revenue.
- In construction field: The borrower has finished the construction, which has been commissioned and accepted, and waits for payment from the investor who is affected by Covid-19 Pandemic. Actually, the borrower has received no money for debt repayment and wants to apply for debt rescheduling.
Answer
- Point c Clause 1 Article 4 of Circular No. 01 stipulates: An outstanding debt, including the principal and/or interest (including the debts regulated by the Government's Decree No. 55/2015/ND-CP , as amended) may be rescheduled if it fully satisfies the following conditions: ...; c) The borrower is unable to repay the principal and/or interest under the loan/finance lease agreement due to decrease in revenue caused by Covid-19 Pandemic.
The decrease in revenue due to Covid-19 Pandemic as prescribed in Point c Clause 1 Article 4 of Circular 01 is the revenue which decreases in comparison with that indicated in the loan/finance lease plan approved by the credit institution or foreign bank branch.
- Pursuant to Point c Clause 1 Article 4 of Circular 01, the debt owed by the borrower whose revenue is not decreased due to Covid-19 Pandemic shall not be rescheduled according to Circular 01.
Question 22
Whether or not the provisions in Circular 01 apply to foreign currency loans?
Answer
- Article 11 of Circular 39 stipulates: “1. Credit institutions and their customers shall agree on a loan denominated either in Vietnamese dong or in another foreign currency unit as appropriate to provisions laid down herein and relevant legislation. 2. Currency unit used for debt repayment is the one used in a loan.”
- Pursuant to Clause 6 and Clause 7 Article 35 of Circular 30, both VND and foreign currency may be used in finance lease.
Thus, credit institutions and foreign bank branches are allowed to grant loans/finance leases in both VND and foreign currency in conformity with relevant laws. Credit institutions and foreign bank branches may also consider and decide debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interests, and retention of debt category with regard to loans and finance leases in foreign currency if they meet the conditions in Circular 01.
Question 23
Whether or not Circular 01 applies to the outstanding debts classified in group 2?
Answer
Credit institutions and foreign bank branches may consider and decide the rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interests/fees on and retention of category of the outstanding debts which have been classified in accordance with SBV’s regulations before January 23, 2020 if they meet the conditions, requirements and principles in Circular 01 regardless of their groups before the debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interests, and retention of debt category.
Question 24
Whether or not Circular 01 applies to individual or household borrowers?
Answer
- Pursuant to Clause 3 Article 2 of Circular 39, borrowers include legal entities established and operating in Vietnam, those established abroad and operating in Vietnam, and Vietnamese and foreign nationals.
According to the answer to question 3 of the Table of answers to questions concerning the Circular No. 39 enclosed with the Official Dispatch No. 1576/NHNN-CSTT dated March 14, 2017, SBV gives opinions about the definition of the term “borrower” in Circular 39 as follows: Clause 3 Article 2 of the Circular No. 39 stipulates that the “borrower” performing a borrowing transaction with a credit institution refers to any legal entity or individual; this regulation is conformable with regulations on entities participating in civil transactions in the Civil Code in 2015. Credit institutions shall consider lending money to entities other than legal entities as lending money to individuals (one or several individuals) in conformity with regulations in the Circular No. 39 and the Civil Code in 2015.
- Clause 14 Article 3 of Circular No. 30 stipulates: Lessee refers to a legal entity or individual that operates in Vietnam and directly uses the leased asset to serve their operations. When a household, artel or organization without a legal status wishes to enter into a finance lease contract, such finance lease contract must be concluded by its member or authorized representative.
Thus, credit institutions and foreign bank branches may consider and decide to reschedule, exempt or reduce interests, and retain the categories of the outstanding debts on loans/finance leases of borrowers that are individuals, households, artels or other organizations without legal status in accordance with Circular 01 and their internal regulations if they meet the conditions and requirements in Circular 01.
Question 25
SBV is requested to provide guidelines on the following contents: Whether or not Circular 01 applies to PPP projects which have been finished and put into operation but have decrease in revenue due to the impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic, and other commercial property loans?
Answer
Circular 01 does not stipulate the loan purposes. Thus, credit institutions and foreign bank branches may and decide to reschedule, exempt or reduce interests, and retain the categories of the outstanding debts if they meet the conditions in Circular 01, regardless of the loan purposes (either investment in PPP projects or purchase of commercial houses).
Question 26
SBV is requested to consider the following proposals:
- The debt should be extended for a longer period (more than 03 months) after the Prime Minister declares an end of the Covid-19 Pandemic or SBV should stipulate a specific extension period (e.g. from January 23, 2020 to January 23, 2021 or to October 31, 2021) for application of the provision in Point b Clause 1 Article 4 of Circular 01.
- The period in Point a Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01 should be extended for more than 10 days.
- The period in Point b Clause 2 Article 4 of Circular 01 should be extended for more than 15 days.
Answer
In the short term, credit institutions and foreign bank branches are requested to carry out debt rescheduling, exemption and reduction of interests and retention of debt category in accordance with the provisions in Circular 01.
SBV will consider the proposals of credit institutions and foreign bank branches and make amendments, if necessary, based on the actual development of Covid-19 Pandemic.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 1Official Dispatch No. 2698/BCT-DTDL dated April 16, 2020 on Electricity price reduction and discounts for customers affected by Covid-19
- 2Circular No. 01/2020/TT-NHNN dated March 13, 2020 on debt rescheduling, exemption or reduction of interest and fees, retention of debt category to assist borrowers affected by Covid-19 pandemic
- 3Decree No. 163/2018/ND-CP dated December 4, 2018 on issuance of corporate bonds
- 4Circular No. 16/2018/TT-BTC dated February 7, 2018 on guidelines for financial regulations applied to credit institutions and branches of foreign banks
- 5Decree No. 93/2017/ND-CP dated August 07, 2017 on the financial regime applicable to credit institutions, branches of foreign banks and financial supervision, assessment of effectiveness of state capital investment in wholly state-owned credit institutions and partially state-owned credit institutions
- 6Circular No. 02/2017/TT-NHNN dated May 17, 2017, on factoring services provided by credit institutions and branches of foreign banks
- 7Official Dispatch No. 1576/NHNN-CSTT dated March 14, 2017 response to questions concerning regulations in the Circular No. 39/2016/TT-NHNN
- 8Circular No. 39/2016/TT-NHNN dated December 30, 2016,
- 9Circular No. 19/2016/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2016, on bank card operations
- 10Circular No. 22/2016/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2016, on the purchase of corporate bonds by credit institutions and branches of foreign banks
- 11Circular No. 30/2015/TT-NHNN dated December 25, 2015, regulations on issuance of licenses, organization and operation of non-bank credit institutions
- 12Law No. 91/2015/QH13 dated November 24, 2015, The Civil Code
- 13Decree No. 55/2015/ND-CP dated June 9, 2015, the credit policy for agricultural and rural development
- 14Circular No. 02/2013/TT-NHNN of January 21, 2013, on classification of assets, levels and method of setting up of risk provisions, and use of provisions against credit risks in the banking activity of credit institutions, foreign banks’ branches
Official Dispatch No. 3339/NHNN-TTGSNH dated May 08, 2020 on guidelines for implementation of Circular No. 01/2020/TT-NHNN
- Số hiệu: 3339/NHNN-TTGSNH
- Loại văn bản: Công văn
- Ngày ban hành: 08/05/2020
- Nơi ban hành: Ngân hàng Nhà nước
- Người ký: Nguyễn Trọng Du
- Ngày công báo: Đang cập nhật
- Số công báo: Dữ liệu đang cập nhật
- Ngày hiệu lực: 08/05/2020
- Tình trạng hiệu lực: Còn hiệu lực